Home China The Real Winner of the Ukraine Crisis Could Be China

The Real Winner of the Ukraine Crisis Could Be China

0

By Gabriela Marin Thornton and Alexey Ilin

The crisis in Ukraine has plunged U.S.-Russian relations to their lowest point since the Cold War.

Crimea is now Russian territory. Although prisoners of war have been exchanged and both sides have agreed to pull back heavy weapons, the accord signed February 12 in Minsk has failed so far to stop the fighting in Eastern Ukraine. The city of Debaltseve has fallen into the hands of the separatists. On Sunday a bomb exploded at a rally in Ukraine’s second largest city Kharkiv killing two – the suspects are accused by the Ukrainian government as having been trained in Russia.China Ukraine

For Washington, the conflict between the West and Russia has become much more than a conflict over Ukraine’s territorial integrity. It has become a provocation to the Western liberal international order that the U.S. worked hard to create at the end of the Cold War; an order based on democracy, the rule of law, and free markets. Russia has not gone down this road. Instead, it is now challenging the European security order and most particularly the Eastern European states.

Talk of a new Cold War has emerged in Washington political circles. Similar views are echoed in Moscow. Konstantin Sonin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, says of the Kremlin’s thinking: “The country [Russia] is on a holy mission. It’s at war with the United States.”

In pushing to impose sanctions against Moscow (and possibly arm the Ukrainians), U.S. policymakers seem to have given little thought to the long-term geopolitical impact of this rift on relations with China.

If there is no viable solution to the Ukrainian conflict, we believe that the unintended “winner” of the crisis could well be China.

Here’s why.

China rising
According the International Monetary Fund, China has now surpassed the United States as the world’s number one economy as measured by purchasing power parity. Beijing is also engaged in a major military buildup. Like other emerging great powers in history – especially the U.S. in the late 19th century – China seeks to emerge as the dominant power in its own region.

Russia is helping to fuel China’s rise. If the U.S. and Europe don’t mend their adversarial relationship with Russia, China will be in a position to counteract the U.S. even sooner.

Russia’s economy is tanking because of collapsing oil prices and Western sanctions. The World Bank now projects that Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) will decline by 2.9 percent in 2015. And the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development estimates that Russia’s economy will shrink by close to five percent this year.

In a desperate attempt to stave off economic disaster, Russia is turning toward Asia to sell its natural resources, obtain loans and forge new military arrangements.

In May 2014, for example, Moscow and Beijing signed a $400 billion gas deal. In November 2014, another framework agreement for gas supply to China was signed. In September 2014, then-U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel pointed out that China and Russia are jointly developing new weapons systems. Russia’s trade with China is expected to increase to $100 billion this year from $90 billion in 2014.

Faustian bargain
The two-fold logic of this rapprochement is simple: China needs resources and Russia has them. Russia needs markets, foreign investment, and money and China has them.

Geopolitical interests also overlap. China does not want the South China Sea dominated by Americans. Russia does not want the West – the U.S. and Europe – to penetrate what Moscow perceives as “its sphere of influence.” In short, Russia and China do not want a world dominated by the U.S. That much is clear.

At the same time, China and Russia are geopolitical rivals. Indeed for Russia, its links to China are a Faustian bargain.

In the short term, Russia gains by selling oil, gas, and other natural resources to China. In the longer term, however, the consequence is to further strengthen the emergence of a China that seems fated to be Russia’s long-term competitor. Moscow is helping China to grow economically and become more powerful even as Russia itself is becoming weaker.

Realpolitik
European leaders are rightly alarmed by the situation in Ukraine. The casualties are mounting and Ukrainian economy is on the verge of collapse. A solution to the crisis needs to be found.

There is a lot of talk, especially in Washington, about the “post-Soviet space” – the former republics of the Soviet Union (like Ukraine) that gained independence following the Soviet collapse. American and European policymakers need to remember that the post-Soviet space was also the pre-Soviet space – the Tsarist Russian empire. Russia still sees itself as the dominant power in a region in which history and culture give it special interests. While the redrawing of Europe’s map, as Vice President Biden puts it, is unacceptable, it is a fact on the ground that will be difficult to undo.

Despite understandable condemnations of the Russian moves, negotiations with Moscow should continue.

Longer term, the U.S. needs to think about how to be a triangular great power. Most U.S. strategic thinkers agree that it is China, not Russia, that poses the most significant 21st century geopolitical challenge to the United States. Strategy 101 would then dictate that Russia should be a counterweight to rising China.

But at the moment U.S. (and European) policy is pushing Russia into China’s arms. This, we would argue, is a geopolitical mistake. If the U.S.-Russia rift is not healed, it is China that will be the winner.

Note: The opinions and comments stated in the preceding article, and views expressed by any contributor to In Homeland Security, do not represent the views of American Military University, American Public University System, its management or employees. This article originally appeared in The Washington Post and is re-published with the permission of its authors.

This article first appeared at:
Simmons Review Logo

The Simmons Review

Comments

comments

Roots In The Military. Relevant To All.

American Military University (AMU) is proud to be the #1 provider of higher education to the U.S. military, based on FY 2018 DoD tuition assistance data, as reported by Military Times, 2019. At AMU, you’ll find instructors who are former leaders in the military, national security, and the public sector who bring their field-tested skills and strategies into the online classroom. And we work to keep our curriculum and content relevant to help you stay ahead of industry trends. Join the 64,000 U.S. military men and women earning degrees at American Military University.

Request Information

Please complete this form and we’ll contact you with more information about AMU. All fields except phone are required.

Validation message here
Validation message here
Validation message here
Validation message here
Validation message here
Validation message here
Validation message here
Validation message here
Validation message here
Ready to apply? Start your application today.

We value your privacy.

By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails, texts, and phone calls and messages from American Public University System, Inc. which includes American Military University (AMU) and American Public University (APU), its affiliates, and representatives. I understand that this consent is not a condition of enrollment or purchase.

You may withdraw your consent at any time. Please refer to our privacy policy, terms, or contact us for more details.